April 5, 2025

System Under Fire: Allegations Surrounding North Carolina’s New eCourts System

Community Resource Consultants Inc. (CRCI)

Community Resource Consultants Inc. (CRCI) is a Michigan-based organization specializing in trauma rehabilitation medical case management. With over 34 years of experience, CRCI is dedicated to empowering survivors of catastrophic auto accidents to regain control of their lives and achieve both physical and emotional well-being. Their team of Licensed Master Social Workers (LMSWs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) are experts in navigating the complexities of today’s healthcare system, ensuring that survivors receive the necessary services for their recovery and rehabilitation. CRCI’s core values include advocacy, people, knowledge, and dependability, reflecting their commitment to being leading advocates and facilitators of long-term collaborative care.

News Summary

North Carolina’s eCourts digital system is facing a federal lawsuit due to allegations of causing unlawful arrests and prolonged detentions. The case involves Tyler Technologies and the Mecklenburg County Sheriff, and has raised significant concerns regarding software flaws and inadequate training. The implementation, criticized by affected individuals and the legal community, has faced pushback over its inefficiencies and security risks, leading to increased workloads for prosecutors. As more individuals are set to be included in the lawsuit, discussions continue without a trial date in sight.

Controversial eCourts System Faces Federal Lawsuit Over Unlawful Arrests

The state of North Carolina is currently embroiled in a legal battle concerning its new digital court system, known as eCourts, which has been accused of causing significant issues, including unlawful arrests and extended detentions in jails. This recent lawsuit is lighting up conversations as more details emerge about the impact of the system on the lives of several individuals.

What’s Happening in Court

A federal lawsuit has been allowed to move forward by U.S. District Judge William Osteen, focusing on the creators of the eCourts system, Tyler Technologies, along with the Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, Garry McFadden. They are facing allegations that serious flaws in the eCourts software contributed to wrongful arrests and hampered the timely release of prisoners. What started as a forward-thinking plan to modernize court operations has now led to a significant legal headache.

Interestingly, the lawsuit involves about a dozen plaintiffs who have been severely affected since eCourts was implemented in 2023 across multiple counties, including Wake, Lee, Harnett, and Johnston. While the eCourts system is designed to streamline judicial processes, it seems to have created a tangled web of complications instead. The system currently serves 62 out of 100 counties within the state and is set to expand to 38 more counties by the fall of 2025. However, this ambitious rollout has hit a snag.

The Details of the Allegations

The plaintiffs’ case shines a spotlight on claims that both software glitches and human errors have led to some individuals being arrested under the same warrants multiple times, and others experiencing unnecessary extended periods of detention after their release. Reports have revealed that during the initial implementation phase, many found themselves unexpectedly held in the Mecklenburg County jail for longer durations than necessary. This situation has understandably raised eyebrows and sparked concern within the affected communities.

Judge Osteen has acknowledged that the plaintiffs’ claims regarding Tyler Technologies’ responsibility for ensuring the software was free from defects are plausible. The lawsuit has also criticized the Mecklenburg Sheriff’s Office for its alleged failure to adequately train its deputies on how to utilize the eCourts software, which compounded the problems and resulted in constitutional violations for many individuals.

Initially, there were additional claims made against leaders of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts and other sheriffs, but those claims have since been voluntarily dropped. The lawsuit is expanding its scope, with intentions to include more individuals who have been negatively affected by the problematic software. Yet, no trial date has been set as discussions surrounding the situation continue.

Community Concerns on the Rollout

The implementation of eCourts has not only faced criticism from those directly affected but has also been met with skepticism from the legal community. Many lawyers argue that the system’s sluggishness and inefficiencies are creating unnecessary delays, ultimately crippling timely case processing and leading to prolonged detentions. This has raised alarms about the potential vulnerability of victims in sensitive situations, such as domestic violence and child custody cases.

Adding to the complexity, elected prosecutors from various counties have reported a burdensome increase in their workloads due to the technological challenges associated with eCourts, hampering their effectiveness and the overall management of cases. Adding fuel to the fire, there are also rising concerns regarding the privacy of sensitive information stored within the eCourts system, with fears from prosecutors about the risks faced by victims and witnesses due to insufficient security measures within the software.

Even in the face of these rising issues and critiques, the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts maintains that the ongoing rollout of eCourts is necessary to mitigate the risks associated with outdated technology. It seems the state has a long way to go in alleviating widespread concerns and ironing out the creases in this digital court system.