Plymouth Courtroom Drama: Attorney Alleges Harassment and Discrimination Against Judges

Plymouth Courtroom Controversy: Harassment Allegations Emerge

Plymouth is currently at the center of a significant legal drama involving a Palestinian-American attorney and two judges from the 35th District Court. The attorney, Sundus Jaber, claims she faced harassment and discrimination not only in her professional environment but also that this mistreatment affected her clients. This situation has sparked much discussion and concern as it unfolds in federal court.

Who’s Involved?

Sundus Jaber, a relatively new public defender at the court, filed her whistleblower lawsuit earlier this year. This case is centered around claims aimed at Chief District Judge Ron Lowe, who is set to retire soon, and District Judge James Plakas. Both judges have firmly denied the allegations against them, stating that as the case evolves, the evidence will bring a different perspective to this controversy.

Claims Made by Jaber

Jaber, who identifies as Muslim and wears a hijab, began her role at the 35th District Court in September 2023. On her very first day, she claims Judge Lowe cautioned her, stating that she needed to recognize that “95% of the people (she) will represent are guilty” and warned her against contesting more than a small fraction of cases. This alarming claim highlights possible biases in the courtroom.

In her lawsuit, Jaber mentions a poor reputation of the 35th District Court concerning attorneys who represent defendants unable to afford private counsel, attributing this largely to Judge Lowe’s conduct. She describes a pattern of behavior in the court that may have contributed to a hostile work environment.

Daily Harassment Allegations

But it doesn’t end there. Jaber’s complaint also mentions that she experienced “nearly daily harassment” from court staff, particularly from Judge Plakas’ court reporter and clerk. She alleges that Plakas allowed this mistreatment to continue, which she claims violated the rights of her clients. In response to these allegations, Judge Plakas said that he “vehemently denies” any wrongdoing, asserting that everything in a courtroom is recorded and thus provides transparency for all proceedings. He believes the evidence will ultimately show he acted fairly.

Seeking Solutions

Prior to turning to the courts for help, Jaber attempted to address the situation through various channels. She reported the harassment to her boss, Teresa Patton, the director of the Regional Managed Assigned Counsel Office, who has also been named in the lawsuit. However, Jaber claims Patton did not take action to report the treatment to the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission, which left her feeling isolated and frustrated.

Jaber also reached out to the former Chief Judge Michael Gerou and Judge Plakas himself for an investigation into the behavior of court staff, reportedly only to face further backlash when Judge Lowe became chief judge. This has led to claims that her hours were cut, significantly impacting her income, as she was only given minimal assignments going forward.

The Bigger Picture

Reflecting on the serious implications of her advocacy work, Jaber mentioned that being a competent and ethical attorney led her into a cycle of harassment, which she described as “unbearable.” She feels it is crucial to shine a light on the treatment indigent defendants face in court, stating, “You will rarely hear about someone suing judges because it’s scary, but I know I am doing the right thing.”

Interestingly, Jaber’s journey toward law is also personal – as a teenager, she was wrongfully convicted in a case overseen by Judge Lowe. This conviction was overturned on appeal, inspiring her passion for criminal defense work.

Looking Ahead

As the legal battle continues, a motion to dismiss the case has been filed by both judges, along with Patton, although this was denied by the court. The case has since been assigned to another district judge, Robert White, and the outcome remains to be seen as both sides prepare for the ongoing proceedings.

As Plymouth watches this courtroom contention unfold, many are hopeful that the truth will ultimately shine through. The community is keen to learn whether the judicial system will be vindicated or if changes are needed to ensure fairness for all defendants in the district.