Plymouth Courtroom Showdown: Candidates Vie for Judgeship Amid Harassment Lawsuit
In the vibrant city of Plymouth, a significant legal battle is brewing as community members prepare to make their voices heard in the upcoming election for a judgeship at the 35th District Court. The position is up for grabs as long-time Chief Judge Ron Lowe plans to retire after an impressive 30 years on the bench. However, this election cycle is marked not only by candidates vying for the seat but also by serious allegations in a federal lawsuit that claim two judges and court staff fostered a hostile environment for a Palestinian-American public defender.
The lawsuit, filed by Sundus Jaber, alleges that she faced harassment and discrimination in her professional role, impacting her ability to serve her clients effectively. This lawsuit is generating significant attention and conversation in the community. Jaber claims that her advocacy led to retaliation against her, with court staff allegedly ignoring her calls for help.
Candidates Step Forward
As residents look forward to voting, two candidates are stepping into the spotlight: Michael Woodyard, a 58-year-old Canton attorney, and Joe Barone, a 53-year-old Plymouth attorney. Both have acknowledged the lawsuit’s implications and have expressed their commitment to a fair judicial process.
Woodyard stated, “The allegations are disturbing, but I recognize” that legal processes take time and must be respected. If elected, he promises a commitment to respecting every individual who comes into the courtroom.
On the other hand, Barone, who has experience running against Judge James Plakas, also extended his respect to both Jaber and Plakas. “I’m not in a position to comment on the specifics,” he said, emphasizing that fairness will be at the heart of his practice if elected.
Meet the Candidates
So, what makes these candidates suited for this pivotal role? Barone has spent nearly 30 years as a “Main Street” attorney, dealing with everything from criminal defense to civil disputes. His vast experience in the community, having managed over 400 cases in just the 35th District Court, helps him understand the unique legal challenges residents face.
Woodyard’s background differs somewhat as he dedicates his career to public service. He spent 15 years as a prosecutor followed by 7 years representing indigent clients as a public defender. His deep commitment to justice shapes his approach and vision for the court, making him feel “at home” in the courtroom.
Strengths and Needed Improvements
According to Woodyard, one of the court’s primary strengths lies in its connection to the community. “Whether it’s a speeding ticket or a more serious matter, the court has a direct impact on people’s lives,” he explained. However, both candidates see a need to improve public trust in the judicial system.
Barone highlighted the court’s alternative sentencing options as a significant asset, suggesting that rehabilitation can effectively address underlying criminal behavior, rather than just handing down jail sentences. He also called for better public understanding of court processes to foster inclusivity and engagement.
Building Trust in the System
Both candidates are aware that public perception is crucial in judicial matters. Barone plans to focus on clear communication during court proceedings, while Woodyard aims to resolve issues in a timely manner to build trust. They both recognize that recent allegations and ongoing discussions about the court’s integrity heighten this responsibility.
Diversity and Inclusion Efforts
Another discussed topic is the court’s representation of community diversity. Woodyard believes that staff with rich experiences from diverse backgrounds can ensure respect for all courtroom visitors. He plans to engage with the community actively and bring awareness to how the court operates.
Barone shares a commitment to ensuring that every individual, regardless of race or religion, is treated fairly. He emphasizes the importance of creating an environment where all voices are heard, and he’s dedicated to supporting translation services for those facing language barriers.
Assessing Indigent Defense
The candidates also weighed in on the state’s efforts in providing adequate representation for indigent defendants. Barone praised improvements made through the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission but acknowledged that challenges remain in implementation. Woodyard, boosting his experience at a public defender’s office, highlighted the need for quality representation for individuals who cannot afford legal services.
The Role of Specialty Courts
The conversation also touched on the effectiveness of specialty courts, such as those for veterans and substance abuse issues. Both candidates see these courts as effective in addressing root causes of behavior, promoting rehabilitation, and reducing recidivism, which in turn fosters a safer and more supportive community.
As the election approaches, Plymouth residents are invited to consider the candidates and their visions for the 35th District Court. With challenges ahead and a commitment to justice on the table, the future of the court remains in the hands of the community—a community ready to express its voice at the ballot box.
